No Time To Cry, Mr Bond

No Time To Cry, Mr Bond

When Babs Broccoli announced that “Bond would never be played by a woman”, she was either lying, or had not weighed up the weight of change that would come with the Feminist take-over of Hollowood. For this Bond release, the gun came pre-loaded and like an Alec Baldwin armorer – all the wrong people got shot.

I guess Babs was also up against the new wave of Politically Correct young directors, cast, and fat-cat money driving the production machinery these days. All of which seem to be currently running Woketopian agendas of the exact same flavour we see creeping into “No Time To Die”.

It’s clearly a precursor to a Feminist take-over. Aligning the black female 007 along side our – soon to be retired – hero was the segue to get us used to the idea that – “this is what’s coming next”. I was amazed we didn’t see a Trans in there somewhere. But it’s the wrong move. This is how you emasculate Bond into something boring.

Maybe that is the intention, but you can’t get rid of the quintessential essence of Bond. It’s an error of judgement to try. And the Franchise is likely dead, if it goes down that road. Why? It’s a simple equation to understand – women can’t do men, better than men. They think they can, but they can’t. We already have the proof of this: Ghostbusters, Ocean’s Eight, most Brie Larson movies, and now this most recent Bond travesty is just another turd to add to that pile of shit movies. It wasn’t totally ruined, but the poison was injected into the vein like Heracles gene-editing toxin.

The 00 women did not add anything, they just diluted the essential Bond energy and sent it off down a road of emasculation. It was not empowering, brave, stunning, or strong, and neither was it a new message that they tried to shove down our throats. Ironically, Feminist Agenda is now the Woolly Mammoth in the room, not Toxic Masculinity.

What that film needed was more Toxic Masculinity to stop it from killing the viewer with boredom. It could be done better than the original Bonds, sure, but you don’t have to gay it up. Maybe there were not many dry eyes in the house with all that lathered on emotional jibber, but I expect there were a lot of dry vaginas. I know mine was.

What’s wrong with “No Time to Die”:

Bond chose love.
Bond had a baby.
Bond took “no” for an answer off a woman with her sexual weaponry set to “stun”.
Bond was replaced by a Politically Correct lesbian black woman (who was about as convincingly dangerous as Brie Larson).
Bond fell to his knees and begged for forgiveness (so what if he was faking it? That’s what women do, it was pathetic, der!).
Bond told a woman she completed him (fuck off, his dysfunction makes him immune to that shit. That’s his job; he’s an able killer of men, women, and children because that’s how you save the world, ffs).
Bond accepted his emasculation like a gender confused teenager at a cosmetics party.
The theme tune was a badly rehashed version of “The writing’s on the wall” from Spectre (A fantastic Bond movie!).
An ass-aching 2.5 hours could have been 1.5 if they had only removed the 00 women and their dire attempts to “do men better”.
If they had removed the 00 women it might have been an okay film.
Jumping between “here’s the amazing new 00 women doing men stuff” and familiar Bond, was cheap messaging and jarring, not evolved or fun.
Removing the essential dysfunctional male “Bond” from the movie made it an obvious attempt to push Feminist agenda and to be safely Politically Correct, who the fuck wants that of Bond?

What’s right with “No Time to Die”:

The first bit, right up to “Five Years Later…”.
Bond got killed (that imposter needed killing before he claimed gender dyspepsia).
This had to happen eventually (Feminists will not be happy until they have taken over all men’s spaces).
Thank god it is finally over, we can now get back to men being men (but without Bond, who will be left on that emasculated island he just died on).
Provides further proof that women cannot understand quintessential Bond, let alone replace him.
The bits where he was alone, dangerous, and violent, but only because he was essentially a good guy, of course.

Why don’t Feminists understand Bond?

It’s a big question, but also covers why they don’t understand what “being a man” is all about (mind you, nor do a lot of men). If Hollowood is a litmus test for exactly what women are trying to achieve by taking over men’s spaces, then it would seem that women are not looking for acknowledgement or equality, they want to be men.

They are jealous of Bond, it is why they are coming for him. Better would be to do their own killer “the female way”. Feminists need to finally understand that there are many things that only men can do convincingly. Bond is one of them. He’s the only man for that job. Women, can’t cut it without becoming a man, and who the fuck wants that?

Bond defines precisely the part of the masculine that women cannot grasp, or invade, however hard they might try, they will always fail dismally. No Time To Die, failed dismally. Which leaves Feminism with no choice but to kill him off and replace him. But it won’t be Bond, it will be something a lot more boring instead.

Is Bond Toxic Masculinity & A Dinosaur?

Abso-fucking-lutely, yes! We exist. We are not going extinct either, because actually you need us. And as much as that upsets the average Feminist, they have to accept it was their Grand-daddy that shot people dead on their behalf just so they could be here today.

And who will fight on the borders tomorrow to keep them safe? Ana de Armas? No she fucking won’t, she can’t fight for shit, she’s a bimbo (with an admittedly great looking rack). Nor will the necessary killing be done by a bland, sexless lesbian black woman, with a back-side too large to be running around in combat gear convincingly while killing trained male soldiers (I’m not lying, you know it’s true).

Dangerous masculine men know all this, even if Feminist’s – and seemingly now Babs Broccoli – do not. Honestly, it’s fucking laughable that they tried to punt that script as a Bond. It’s also painfully embarrassing. That was not James Bond, it was Disney Bond.

For decades we have been hearing how, “men don’t understand women”, but the truth is that most women don’t understand men either. Women cannot do men, better than men. Fact.

They have not lined up a new Bond here, they have lined up the next Brie Larson damp flangery. Thus proving to the world, what the rest of us knew already, that women can’t do men.

Bond is now dead to me. But his essence will return in some form, somewhere, eventually. Sure, you can kill us off and replace us with emasculated, sexless lesbians that can’t fight for shit, but eventually you’ll go extinct if you do.

So Feminism finally invaded the last bastion of sacred dysfunctional masculinity, but all they achieved was 00 women doing Disney, and that’s how it will be moving forward. Bravo.

Bond is Dead. Long live Bond!

The Petty Tyrant – Dealing With Bullies

The Petty Tyrant – Castaneda Quotes

Castaneda was a fraud but he was a coyote teacher: i.e. he taught with stories, but his stories were borrowed or made up. His claim was that he was taught to become a warrior/sorcerer by a wise old Mexican Indian called Don Juan who himself was part of an ancient lineage of mysterious teachings going back to pre-Aztec periods.

The concept of The Petty Tyrant (Bully) is extremely valuable to modern day folk in dealing with people who have power over us but abuse that power, consciously or otherwise.

I share some quotes below from CCs books on the key concepts, and after 40 years of applying them, I have finally started to see for myself how accurate this method is.

Quotes are from Chapter 2 of “The Fire From Within”:

Develop A Strategy

Don Juan explained that the mistake average men make in confronting petty tyrants is not to have a strategy to fall back on; the fatal flaw is that average men take themselves too seriously; their actions and feelings, as well as those of the petty tyrants, are all-important. Warriors, on the other hand, not only have a well-thought-out strategy, but are free from self-importance. What restrains their self-importance is that they have understood that reality is an interpretation we make.

Self-Importance Is Our Greatest Enemy

Self-importance is our greatest enemy. Think about it – what weakens us is feeling offended by the deeds and misdeeds of our fellow men. Our self-importance requires that we spend most of our lives offended by someone. “The new seers recommended that every effort should be made to eradicate self-importance from the lives of warriors.”

Control, Discipline, Forbearance, Timing

Don Juan: “”My benefactor (Don Juan’s teacher) developed a strategy using the four attributes of warriorship: control, discipline, forbearance, and timing… The idea of using a petty tyrant is not only for perfecting the warrior’s spirit, but also for enjoyment and happiness.””

Carlos asked: “How could anyone enjoy the monster you described?”

Don Juan: “He was nothing in comparison to the real monsters that the new seers faced during the Conquest. By all indications those seers enjoyed themselves blue dealing with them. They proved that even the worst tyrants can bring delight, provided, of course, that one is a warrior.”

Don Juan’s Story of Facing A Petty Tyrant

Don Juan then tells a story of becoming abused by a manager working under a Mexican land owner, this manager (referred to as “the man” in the below quotes) had the power to kill him, but would have to do it without the land owner knowing.

During this time he was also under the teachings of his Benefactor in the arts of becoming a warrior. He was now applying Control, discipline, forbearance, timing, and a curious final part defined as Will. (I don’t share discussion on Will, as it is not something we can apply in the strategy).

Don Juan: “My control made me fulfill the man’s most asinine demands. I gladly did everything he asked of me. I was joyful and strong. And I didn’t give a fig about my pride or my fear. I was there as an impeccable warrior. To tune the spirit when someone is trampling on you is called control.

Don Juan then explained that his benefactor’s strategy required that instead of feeling sorry for himself as he had done before, he immediately got to work mapping the man’s strong points, his weaknesses, his quirks of behavior. (He had been a prisoner to the same man years before but escaped, once he started his warrior training he was advised by his benefactor to go back and use this Petty Tyrant to cement his lessons).

He added that his benefactor’s strategy called for a systematic harassment of the man by taking cover with a higher order, just as the seers of the new cycle had done during the Conquest by shielding themselves with the Catholic church. A lowly priest was sometimes more powerful than a nobleman. Don Juan’s shield was the lady who got him the job. He kneeled in front of her and called her a saint every time he saw her.

Don Juan said that timing is the quality that governs the release of all that is held back. So one day, in the presence of the other workers but in sight of his lady as well, don Juan insulted the man. He called him a coward, who was mortally afraid of the boss’s wife.

His benefactor’s strategy had called for being on the alert for a moment like that and using it to turn the tables on the petty tyrant. Unexpected things always happen that way. The lowest of the slaves suddenly makes fun of the tyrant, taunts him, makes him feel ridiculous in front of significant witnesses, and then rushes away without giving the tyrant time to retaliate.

The man and his friends called him to the back, allegedly to do some work. The man was very pale, white with anger. From the sound of his voice don Juan knew what the man was really planning to do. Don Juan pretended to acquiesce, but instead of heading for the back, he ran for the stables. He trusted that the horses would make such a racket the owners would come out to see what was wrong. He knew that the man would not go where the horses were – that is, unless he had been pushed beyond his endurance.

“I jumped inside the stall of the wildest stallion,” don Juan said, “and the petty tyrant, blinded by rage, took out his knife and jumped in after me. I went instantly behind my planks. The horse kicked him once and it was all over.

I had spent six months in that house and in that period of time I had exercised the four attributes of warriorship. Thanks to them, I had succeeded. Not once had I felt sorry for myself or wept in impotence. I had been joyful and serene. My control and discipline were as keen as they’d ever been, and I had had a firsthand view of what forbearance and timing did for impeccable warriors. And I had not once wished the man to die.”

The Male Biological Imperative

The Male Biological Imperative


Man shielding a woman he did not know during the Las Vegas shooting (Click on image for more info)

Introduction

The Male Biological Imperative and Female HypoAgency are two forces that work together and need to be understood for men and women to progress with integrity. I will deal with The Male Biological Imperative in this article and Female HypoAgency in another, but will mention both in each.

[This was first published in 2019 as part of a larger article, but has been adapted here for brevity and clarity]

Continue reading

Entitled Princess Syndrome

Entitled Princess Syndrome

A recent interview with Keira Knightley got my attention. It can be read here, but I will share the relevant points below, here’s the quote.

“In the age of #MeToo, actress Keira Knightley says that she does not know anyone (woman) who hasn’t been harassed at some point. The interview took place while wandering the streets of North London. During the interview, journalist Lydia Slater notes, a lone male stranger allegedly approached Knightley and shouted at her,
“Do you go to this school? You look very young!”
“Thank you,” replied Knightley as she and Slater sought “sanctuary in a nearby garden square” where the man proceeded to follow them.”


On first read this seems perfectly understandable. But lets consider a few things.

Continue reading

The Currency Of “Attention”

The Currency Of “Attention”

Her body, Her choice“, and Fuck you!

The ever-more-obvious vagina-and-ass-hugging design is putting virtually-naked women in the public domain without any consideration for the effect on others.

We are told – “Her body, her choice” – but this is an incredibly self-centered and entitled approach to take. These outfits are designed to grab men’s attention, but not for the reason we assume.

Continue reading

Shame-Violence Intervention Method

Shame-Violence Intervention Method

Jonathan Asser ran therapy sessions for violent offenders in HM Prison Wandsworth, UK. His method was unheard of before and it had 100% success rate, also something not thought possible. He detailed his method (link at the bottom of this article), and it involved understanding that shame is at the root of ALL violence. Knowing this, offers a way out of violent reaction.

Continue reading

“Where do I go to meet a woman I want to have a long term relationship with? I’ve mostly been in and out of bars just trying to get laid.”

“Where do I go to meet a woman I want to have a long term relationship with? I’ve mostly been in and out of bars just trying to get laid.”

Ah yea, I love this question… been dying to see someone post it on a forum and I finally got the chance to answer it yesterday, so thought I would share it in a blog post on here.


Continue reading